Showing posts with label urban development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label urban development. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

City of Columbia Approves Bull Street Deal

The City Council took a vote, and by a 4-2 margin, the City is going to sign a certain contract with a developer and move forward with the Bull Street development.
The agreement commits the city to the $31 million in public aid for water and sewer lines, streets and other utilities and possibly an additional $40 million for two parking garages and the baseball stadium that would double as a concert and civic-function venue. The deal also saves from demolition five major buildings on the nearly 200 year-old state mental health facilities campus. But the agreement leaves most the remaining 40 without any protection.
I really hope this development works out. I think the City needs a baseball stadium about as much as it needs Sherman to ride through again, but that's just my opinion.

Hopefully, it works out. I thought it was interesting that Councilwoman Devine didn't vote because she had a "prior commitment". Could that be a possible way for her to have hedged her bet?

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/07/09/2854206/new-crowd-groans-as-attempt-to.html#storylink=cpy

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Wal-Mart Coming to Downtown Columbia?

If you want to be heard, there is a public forum on December 19, 2011 at 6:00PM at 701 Whaley. I don't live over on that side of town, so I don't really have a dog in the fight. The only thing I would say is that I think putting a Wal-Mart there is better than not developing the area at all. It would be one thing if there was an alternative plan, but I haven't heard any alternatives. A good plan executed now is usually better than a perfect plan executed later.

On the practical side, a Wal-Mart would provide a convenient location for USC students in the area to get cheap stuff for their dorm rooms, and it would probably be the closest grocery store to them.

I understand that some people are against Wal-Mart because they fear it will put smaller retailers out of business, but I'm not really buying that argument in this case. I like being able to go to Wal-Mart to buy certain things very cheaply. Oh, and it will bring some jobs and tax revenue in to Columbia - that's not a horrible thing.

If Permanent Press had a vote (and it doesn't) it would vote to allow Wal-Mart to develop the property rather than let the dilapidated baseball stadium just sit there.

Anyone disagree?